Marcan priority without Q explorations in the Farrer hypothesis
"This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of t...
| Otros Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Edición: | First published |
| Colección: | Library of New Testament studies;
455 T & T Clark library of biblical studies |
| Materias: | |
| Ver en Biblioteca de la Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca: | https://koha.upsa.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=302993 |
Solicitar por préstamo interbibliotecario:
Correo
| Formulario
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Machine generated contents note:
- Introduction
- John C. Poirier and Jeffrey Peterson1. 'The Devil in the Detail: Exorcising Q from the Beelzebul Controversy'
- Eric Eve2. 'Problems with the Non-Aversion Principle for Reconstructing Q'
- Stephen C. Carlson3. 'Luke-Crank or Creative Genius? How Ancient Rhetoric Makes Sense of Luke's Order'
- Heather M. Gorman4. 'Too Good to be Q: High Verbatim Agreement in the Double Tradition'
- Mark Goodacre5. 'Luke 11.2-4: The Lord's Prayer (Abridged Edition)'
- Ken Olson6. 'A Statistical Time Series Approach to the Use of Mark by Matthew and Luke'
- Andris Abakuks7. 'Matthew's Ending and the Genesis of Acts: The Farrer Hypothesis and the Composition of Luke's Two Volumes'
- Jeffrey Peterson8. 'Reconsidering the Date of Luke in Light of the Farrer Hypothesis'
- David Landry9. 'Delbert Burkett's Defense of Q'
- John C. Poirier10. Response
- John S. KloppenborgBibliographyIndex.
