Improving risk communication
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Autor Corporativo: | |
Formato: | Libro electrónico |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Washington, D.C. :
National Academy Press
1989.
|
Edición: | 1st ed |
Materias: | |
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009820392806719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- IMPROVING RISK COMMUNICATION
- Copyright
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- Summary
- A NEW PERSPECTIVE
- COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT RISK COMMUNICATION
- PROBLEMS OF RISK COMMUNICATION
- Problems Deriving from the Institutional and Political Systems
- Problems of Risk Communicators and Recipients
- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Management of the Process
- Setting Realistic Goals
- Safeguarding Openness
- Safeguarding Balance and Accuracy in Risk Messages
- Fostering Competence
- Risk Communication in Crisis Conditions
- Content of Risk Messages
- Relating the Message to the Audiences' Perspectives
- Handling Uncertainty
- Comparing Risks
- Ensuring Completeness
- A Consumer's Guide to Risk and Risk Communication
- Research Needs
- 1 Introduction
- THE NEW INTEREST IN "RISK COMMUNICATION"
- Requirement for or Desire by Government to Inform
- Desire to Overcome Opposition to Decisions
- Desire to Share Power Between Government and Public Groups
- Desire to Develop Effective Alternatives to Direct Regulatory Control
- A NEW DEFINITION OF RISK COMMUNICATION
- RISK MESSAGES AS PART OF THE RISK COMMUNICATION PROCESS
- SUCCESSFUL RISK COMMUNICATION
- NOTES
- 2 Understanding Hazards and Risks
- TOWARD QUANTIFICATION OF HAZARDS
- KNOWLEDGE NEEDED FOR RISK DECISIONS
- Information About the Nature of Risks and Benefits
- Information on Alternatives
- Uncertainties in Knowledge About Risks and Benefits
- Information on Management
- Other Relevant Knowledge
- Summary
- GAPS AND UNCERTAINTIES IN KNOWLEDGE
- Identification of Hazards
- Estimation of Exposure
- Estimation of the Probability of Harm
- Identification of Synergistic Effects
- Summary
- SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT AND ERRORS IN JUDGMENT
- Inappropriate Reliance on Limited Data
- Tendency to Impose Order on Random Events.
- Tendency to Fit Ambiguous Evidence into Predispositions
- Tendency to Systematically Omit Components of Risk
- Overconfidence in the Reliability of Analyses
- Summary
- INFLUENCES OF HUMAN VALUES ON KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RISK
- Choices of Numerical Measures for Risk
- Values and the Attributes of Hazards
- IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK COMMUNICATION
- NOTES
- 3 Conflict About Hazards and Risks
- IS RISK INCREASING OR DECREASING?
- It Is the Safest of Times
- It Is the Riskiest of Times
- Understanding the Conflict
- CHANGES IN THE NATURE OF HAZARDS AND IN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THEM
- Increased Understanding of Human Influence on Hazards
- Worsening Worst Cases
- Unintended Side Effects
- Changing Portfolio of Hazards
- CHANGES IN U.S. SOCIETY
- Increasing Affluence
- Increasing Dependence of the Economy on Technology
- Distrust of Institutions
- The Environmental Movement
- New Public Institutions
- POLITICIZATION OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL DEBATE
- Concepts of Regulation
- Tort Law
- Regulatory Procedures
- Politically Potent Symbolic Events
- Increased Focus on Science in Technological Debates
- Institutionalization of Scientific Conflict
- IMPLICATIONS OF CONFLICT FOR COMMUNICATION
- Differential Knowledge
- Vested Interests
- Value Differences
- Mistrust of Expert Knowledge as Interest Serving
- Note for Risk Message Designers
- NOTES
- 4 Purposes of Risk Communication and Risk Messages
- SETTINGS OF RISK COMMUNICATION
- Public Debate
- Personal Action
- INFORMATION AND INFLUENCE: THE PURPOSES OF RISK MESSAGES
- Information
- Influence
- Highlighting Facts
- "Framing" Information and Decisions
- Risk Comparisons
- Persuasive Use of Facts
- Appeals to Authority
- Appeals to Emotion
- USE OF INFLUENCE TECHNIQUES IN RISK COMMUNICATION
- Achieving Balance
- Achieving Influence
- Influence and Personal Action.
- Influence and Public Debate
- NOTES
- 5 Common Misconceptions About Risk Communication
- EXPECTATIONS REGARDING RISK COMMUNICATION
- Communication, Conflict, and Management
- Comparing Risks
- BELIEFS ABOUT THE FUNCTIONING OF THE PROCESS
- Adequacy of the Scientific Information Base
- Agreement as to the Meaning of Existing Information
- Interpretation of Public Attitudes and Information Needs
- STEREOTYPES ABOUT INTERMEDIARIES AND RECIPIENTS
- Journalists and the News Media
- The Attraction of Decisive Answers
- NOTE
- 6 Problems of Risk Communication
- PROBLEMS DERIVING FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL SYSTEM
- Legal Considerations
- Statutory Prescriptions and Proscriptions
- Liability
- Informed Consent and Right-to-Know
- Sharing of Power
- Fragmentation
- Dispersion of Responsibility
- Incentives to Gain Leverage
- Difficulty in Determining Responsibility for Outcomes
- Imbalanced Access to Information
- Systematic Interests and Biases
- PROBLEMS OF RISK COMMUNICATORS AND RECIPIENTS
- Establishing and Recognizing Credibility
- Real or Perceived Advocacy of Unjustified Positions
- Reputation for Deceit, Misrepresentation, or Coercion
- Contradiction of Previous Positions
- Self-Serving Framing of Messages
- Contradictory Messages from Other Sources
- Professional Incompetence and Impropriety
- Legal Standing
- Justification of Communication Campaigns
- Access of Affected Parties to the Decision-Making Process
- Fair Review of Conflicting Claims
- Making Messages Understandable
- Unfamiliar Language
- Unfamiliar Magnitudes
- Insensitivity to Psychological Needs of the Recipient
- Preparing Messages with Few Data and No Time
- Responding in an Emergency
- Communicating on the Basis of Incomplete Information
- Capturing and Focusing Attention
- Stimulating Recipient Interest.
- Interacting with the News Media and Other Intermediaries
- Getting Information
- Authorities Who Do Not Listen or Respond
- Difficulties in Finding Trusted Sources of Information
- SUMMARY
- NOTE
- 7 Recommendations for Improving Risk Communication
- MANAGEMENT OF THE PROCESS
- Setting Realistic Goals
- Safeguarding Openness
- Effective Dialogue
- Early and Sustained Interaction
- The Empowerment Problem
- Safeguarding Balance and Accuracy in Risk Messages- Preventing Real and Perceived Distortion
- Accountability
- Independent Review
- Message Preview
- Written Document
- Fostering Competence-Making Risk Communication Smarter
- Assessment of Audience
- Specialized Talent
- Scientific/Technical Accuracy and Completeness
- Evaluation and Feedback
- Role of Intermediaries
- Some Notes on Handling Risk Communication in Crisis Conditions
- THE CONTENT OF RISK MESSAGES
- Relating the Message to the Audiences' Perspectives
- Personal Relevance
- Clarity
- Respect for the Audience and Its Concerns
- Use of "Influence Strategies"
- Handling Uncertainty
- Comparing Risks
- Ensuring Completeness
- A CONSUMER'S GUIDE TO RISK AND RISK COMMUNICATION
- Project Support
- Project Management
- Content of the Guide
- RESEARCH NEEDS
- Risk Comparison
- Risk Characterization
- Role of Message Intermediaries
- Pertinency and Sufficiency of Risk Information
- Psychological Stress
- Recipients' "Mental Models"
- Risk Literacy
- Retrospective Cases
- Contemporaneous Assessments of Risk Cases
- Appendixes
- Appendix A Background Information on Committee Members and Professional Staff
- COMMITTEE MEMBERS
- PROFESSIONAL STAFF
- Appendix B Bibliography
- Appendix C Risk: A Guide to Controversy
- FOREWORD BY THE COMMITTEE
- PREFACE
- CONTENTS
- I INTRODUCTION
- USAGE
- SOME CAUTIONS
- II THE SCIENCE.
- WHAT ARE THE BOUNDS OF THE PROBLEM?
- The Causal Model
- The Fault Tree
- Materials and Energy Flow Diagrams
- A Risk Analysis Checklist
- WHAT IS THE HARD SCIENCE RELATED TO THE PROBLEM?
- Judgments of Risk
- Judgments of Values
- Refining Common Sense
- Informing People About Risks
- Risk-Taking Propensity
- Protective Behavior
- ADHERENCE TO ESSENTIAL RULES OF SCIENCE
- HOW DOES JUDGMENT AFFECT THE RISK ESTIMATION PROCESS?
- Acknowledging the Role of Judgment
- Diagnosing the Role of Judgment
- Assessing the Quality of the Judgment
- How Good Are Expert Judgments?
- Sensitivity to Sample Size
- Hindsight
- Judging Probabilistic Processes
- Judging the Quality of Evidence
- SUMMARY
- III SCIENCE AND POLICY
- SEPARATING FACTS AND VALUES
- Values Shape Facts
- Facts Shape Values
- MEASURING RISK
- Which Hazards Are Being Considered?
- Definition of Risk
- Dimensionality of Risk
- Summary Statistics
- Bounding the Technology
- Concern
- MEASURING BENEFITS
- Definition of Benefit
- Expressed Preferences
- Revealed Preferences
- SUMMARY
- IV THE NATURE OF THE CONTROVERSY
- THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN "ACTUAL" AND "PERCEIVED" RISKS IS MISCONCEIVED
- LAYPEOPLE AND EXPERTS ARE SPEAKING DIFFERENT LANGUAGES
- LAYPEOPLE AND EXPERTS ARE SOLVING DIFFERENT PROBLEMS
- DEBATES OVER SUBSTANCE MAY DISGUISE BATTLES OVER FORM, AND VICE VERSA
- LAYPEOPLE AND EXPERTS DISAGREE ABOUT WHAT IS FEASIBLE
- LAYPEOPLE AND EXPERTS SEE THE FACTS DIFFERENTLY
- SUMMARY
- V STRATEGIES FOR RISK COMMUNICATION
- CONCEPTS OF RISK COMMUNICATION
- SOME SIMPLE STRATEGIES
- Give the Public the Facts
- Sell the Public the Facts
- Give the Public More of What It Has Gotten in the Past
- Give the Public Clear-Cut, Noncontroversial Statements of Regulatory Philosophy
- Let the Marketplace Decide
- Put Risk Managers on the Firing Line.
- Involve Local Communities in Resolving Their Own Risk Management Problems.