Funding health sciences research a strategy to restore balance
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Autor Corporativo: | |
Otros Autores: | , |
Formato: | Libro electrónico |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Washington, D.C. :
National Academy Press
1990.
|
Edición: | 1st ed |
Materias: | |
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009820337106719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Funding Health Sciences Research
- Copyright
- Foreword
- Preface
- Contents
- Executive Summary
- OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
- RECOMMENDATIONS
- Rebalancing Health Sciences Research Funds
- 1. No Real Growth:
- 2. Two Percent Real Growth:
- 3. Four Percent Real Growth:
- 4. More Rapid Growth:
- Talent Renewal
- Improving the Research Project Grants System
- Changes in Research Management
- The Physical Infrastructure
- Establishing an Ongoing Process for Research Program Management and Oversight
- Improving Communication Among Federal Agencies
- Improving Communication Between Federal and Nonfederal Health Sciences Research Sponsors
- SCIENTIST RESPONSIBILITIES
- A CALL TO ACTION
- 1 Introduction
- OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
- BOUNDARIES AND GOALS OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
- REFERENCES
- 2 Funding for Health Sciences Research
- FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR HEALTH SCIENCES R&
- D
- NIH and ADAMHA
- Centers for Disease Control
- Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
- Department of Veterans Affairs
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Health Care Financing Administration
- Department of Defense
- Department of Energy
- INDUSTRY
- Pharmaceutical Industry
- Biotechnology
- General Trends
- Legislation Affecting Corporate R&
- D
- University-Industry Cooperation
- NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
- Foundations
- Voluntary Health Agencies
- Medical Research Organizations
- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- 3 Setting Federal Science and Technology Priorities
- SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ADVICE TO GOVERNMENT
- Presidential Science and Technology Advice
- Congressional Science and Technology Advice
- Priority Setting Within NIH/ADAMHA
- Office of the Director
- Institute Planning
- FEDERAL BUDGET PROCESS.
- Presidential Budget Development
- Agency Budget Requests
- Office of Management and Budget
- Congressional Budget Process
- Authorizing Committees
- Budget Committees
- Appropriations Committees
- Adjusting Allocations
- Problems Identified by Congress
- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- 4 Supporting Research Through NIH and ADAMHA
- ALLOCATIONS FOR NIH AND ADAMHA
- NIH DIRECT OPERATIONS
- Intramural Research
- NIH Extramural Programs: R&
- D Grants
- SETTING PROGRAM PRIORITIES THROUGH PEER REVIEW
- Priority Scores
- Award Rates
- National Advisory Councils
- Trends in Grant Size
- RESEARCH SCIENTIST TRENDS
- Applicant Trends
- Investigator Turnover
- Multiple Awards
- R&
- D CONTRACTS
- R&
- D CENTERS
- RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION
- Grants Management-The Florida Demonstration Project
- Biomedical Research Support Grants
- INCREASING COSTS OF ANIMAL USE
- INDIRECT COST RECOVERY
- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- 5 Nurturing Scientific Talent
- PROBLEMS IN THE HUMAN RESOURCE BASE
- Precollege
- Undergraduate
- Scientific Doctorates (Ph.D.s)
- Professional Doctorates (M.D.s and M.D./Ph.D.s)
- From Degree to Scientist
- PROBLEMS WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT BASE
- Other Support Mechanisms
- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- 6 Restoring the Physical Infrastructure for Health Sciences Research
- ADEQUACY AND SUITABILITY OF RESEARCH SPACE
- Construction and Renovation Investment
- ADEQUACY AND SUITABILITY OF RESEARCH EQUIPMENT
- SOURCES OF SUPPORT FOR FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
- State and Local Government
- Federal Grant Programs
- Indirect Cost Recovery
- Debt Financing
- Institutional Funds
- Foundations and Voluntary Health Agencies
- Industrial Participation
- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- 7 Policy Overview and Recommendations.
- SUPPORT FOR HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
- Patterns and Policies of Federal Health Sciences Support
- Research Community Perceptions
- A Brief Review of Past Policy Decisions for Resource Allocation
- The First 20 Years: Balanced Growth in Research Support
- Constrained Growth and Instability in the 1970s
- Further Constraints and Crises in the 1980s
- Peer Review Process and Allocation Policy
- Conclusions on Research Funding
- Support for Training
- Support for Equipment and Facilities
- TOWARD A POSITIVE RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT
- General Research Funding Guideline
- TALENT RENEWAL
- IMPROVING THE RESEARCH PROJECT GRANTS SYSTEM
- RESTORING THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
- ESTABLISHING AN ONGOING PROCESS FOR RESEARCH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
- SCIENTIST RESPONSIBILITIES
- A CALL TO ACTION
- REFERENCES
- Appendix A Tables
- Appendix B Biographies of Committee Members
- Appendix C Task Forces
- TASK FORCE 1 - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM
- Committee Members
- Invited Guests
- TASK FORCE 2 - GOALS OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
- Committee Members
- Invited Guest
- TASK FORCE 3 - OPTIMIZING THE ENVIRONMENT FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
- Committee Members
- Invited Guests
- Appendix D Respondents to Input Request
- Index.