Biomedical politics

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Corporativo: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee to Study Biomedical Decision Making (-)
Otros Autores: Hanna, Kathi E. (-)
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press 1991.
Edición:1st ed
Materias:
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009820323406719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Biomedical Politics
  • Copyright
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments
  • Contents
  • Introduction
  • References
  • Unproven AIDS Therapies: The Food and Drug Administration and DDI
  • THE DRUG REGULATION PROCESS
  • The Drug Approval Process Today
  • Speeding Up the Process: The "Bush Initiative
  • Prelicensing Availability
  • PARALLEL TRACK
  • PARALLEL TRACK: PROS AND CONS
  • The Food and Drug Administration
  • The Research Community
  • The AIDS Activists
  • Other Consumer Interests
  • EARLY RELEASE OF DDI
  • MOTIVATIONS
  • Bristol-Myers
  • The Food and Drug Administration
  • The National Institutes of Health
  • The Activists
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • NOTES
  • REFERENCES
  • Commentary
  • LEON EISENBERG
  • Commentary
  • PETER F. CARPENTER
  • A Political History of RU-486
  • Introducing Contraceptives to the United States
  • THE EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF RU-486
  • COMMERCIAL INTEREST IN RU-486
  • THE GROWING THREAT OF ANTI-ABORTION GROUPS
  • CORPORATE PRESSURE FOR WITHDRAWAL
  • THE RETURN OF RU-486
  • THE CONTINUING OPPOSITION
  • SUCCESS OF THE BOYCOTT THREAT
  • THE FEMINIST AND MEDICAL COMMUNITY RESPONSE
  • INTERNATIONAL RU-486 AVAILABILITY
  • GETTING RU-486 TO THE UNITED STATES
  • INDUSTRY CONSTRAINTS ON RU-486 DEVELOPMENT
  • Market Share and Price
  • FDA Review
  • Product Liability
  • Public Relations
  • AMERICAN ACCESS TO RU-486 IN THE 1990S
  • REFERENCES
  • Commentary
  • WILLIAM N. HUBBARD
  • Commentary
  • PETER F. CARPENTER
  • The Human Genome Project: The Formation of Federal Policies in the United States, 1986-1990
  • TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND
  • ORIGINS OF DEDICATED GENOME RESEARCH PROGRAMS
  • THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PLAN
  • THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY RESPONDS
  • CALLS FOR EVALUATION
  • THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH AND CONGRESS RESPOND
  • THE PROJECT IS FUNDED
  • SOCIAL ISSUES EMERGE
  • STILL, ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • APPENDIX A.
  • Where Was OSTP?
  • APPENDIX B
  • Can the Genome Project Keep Its Promises?
  • APPENDIX C
  • Is Cost Wobble a Serious Problem?
  • APPENDIX D
  • What Is "Technically Feasible" in the Policy Context?
  • REFERENCES
  • Commentary
  • PAUL BERG
  • Commentary
  • ERNEST R. MAY
  • Origins of the Medicare Kidney Disease Entitlement: The Social Security Amendments of 1972
  • A HISTORICAL FOOTNOTE
  • ANTECEDENTS TO THE 1972 LEGISLATION
  • The Influence of the Gottschalk Report
  • Setting the Legislative Stage
  • THE SOCIAL SECURITY AMENDMENTS OF 1972, SECTION 299I
  • The Legislative Process
  • The Policy Context
  • The Adoption of Section 299I
  • Ways and Means: November and December 1971
  • Senate Finance Committee: 1972
  • The Joint House-Senate Conference Committee: 1972
  • ESTIMATES OF COST
  • SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  • AFTERWORD
  • APPENDIX
  • Public Law 92-603, 92nd Congress, H.R. 1 October 30, 1972
  • NOTES
  • REFERENCES
  • Commentary
  • CARL W. GOTTSCHALK
  • Commentary
  • STANLEY JOEL REISER
  • Deliberations of the Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Panel
  • BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
  • PROCESS
  • THE MORAL STATUS OF THE FETUS AND THE MORALITY OF ABORTION
  • COMPLICITY, COLLABORATION, AND COOPERATION IN MORAL EVIL
  • INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF ABORTIONS
  • General Altruism
  • Specific Altruism
  • Incentives of Financial Gain
  • SOCIETAL LEGITIMATION OF ABORTION DECISIONS AND PRACTICES
  • DISPOSITIONAL AUTHORITY OVER FETAL REMAINS
  • LIMITS ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION AND DECISION MAKING
  • OTHER ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • OTHER DEVELOPMENTS AND PUBLIC POLICY RESPONSES
  • CONCLUSION
  • APPENDIX A
  • APPENDIX B
  • Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Panel
  • REFERENCES
  • ADDITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • Commentary
  • PATRICIA A. KING
  • NOTES
  • Commentary
  • WALTER HARRELSON
  • Asilomar and Recombinant DNA: The End of the Beginning.
  • THE COMING OF AGE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
  • Structure of DNA
  • Fruit Flies, Corn, and Molds
  • The Need for Germs
  • An International Frontier
  • SETTING THE STAGE: THE EXPERIMENT AND ITS EFFECTS
  • Critique
  • The Encounter
  • The "First" Asilomar Conference
  • EcoRI
  • Scientific Exchange and Scrutiny
  • THE 1973 GORDON CONFERENCE ON NUCLEIC ACIDS
  • THE ACADEMY'S TURN
  • THE ASILOMAR CONFERENCE
  • Monday, February 24-Opening Day
  • Tuesday, February 25-Getting Down to Guidelines
  • Wednesday, February 26-Dissonance and Lessons in the Law
  • Thursday, February 27-The Final Hours
  • CONCLUSION
  • NOTES
  • APPENDIX
  • Participants in the International Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules Asilomar Conference Center ...
  • Organizing Committee
  • Domestic Participants
  • Foreign Participants
  • Press Participants
  • Commentary
  • DOROTHY NELKIN
  • Commentary
  • PAUL SLOVIC
  • THE NATURE OF PERCEPTION
  • THE EFFECTS OF PERCEPTIONS
  • REFERENCES
  • Conclusions
  • THEMES OF DECISION MAKING
  • Pluralism and Democracy
  • Incrementalism
  • Chance, Fate, and Politics
  • Precedents and the Slippery Slope
  • Politics, Expertise, and Process
  • QUESTIONS FOR RESEARCH
  • How and Why Does an Issue Become Public, and What Is the Proper Response?
  • What Are the Roles of Science Versus the Public in Risk Recognition, Perception, Assessment, and Management?
  • What Are the Role and Impact of the Media in Publicizing and Defining the Debate?
  • How Can We Evaluate and Predict the Impact of Single-Issue Politics?
  • How Have the Ground Rules and Institutions Changed in Biomedical Decision Making?
  • How Can Costs of Research and Treatment Be Estimated to Diminish Future Conflicts?
  • When Is Consensual Decision Making the Most Desirable Approach?
  • What Are the Domains of Politics and Science? Where Do They Overlap? What Is the Role of Expertise?.
  • Who Represents the Public?
  • QUESTIONS FOR POLICY MAKERS
  • REFERENCES
  • Appendixes
  • Appendix A The Public and the Expert in Biomedical Policy Controversies
  • QUESTIONING THE EXPERTS: THE CHALLENGE FROM LAYMEN
  • QUESTIONING THE EXPERTS: THE CHALLENGE FROM OFFICIALDOM
  • THE EXPERT'S JOURNEY INTO PUBLIC DOMAIN
  • CONCLUSION
  • REFERENCES
  • Appendix B Biographical Notes on Authors and Commentators
  • Index.