Resource sharing in biomedical research
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , |
| Formato: | Libro electrónico |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Washington, D.C. :
National Academy Press
1996.
|
| Edición: | 1st ed |
| Materias: | |
| Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009820304806719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro
- Copyright
- Preface
- Contents
- Executive Summary
- CASE STUDIES
- The American Type Culture Collection
- The Multinational Coordinated Arabidopsis Thaliana Genome Research Project
- The Jackson Laboratory
- The Washington Regional Primate Research Center
- The Macromolecular Crystallography Resource at the Cornell High-Energy Synchrotron Source
- The Human Genome Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Features of Successful Resource Sharing
- Strong Scientific Leadership in Agencies and the Research Community
- Adequate Core Funding
- Marketing and Advertising
- Clear Guidelines about Ownership and Access
- User Fees
- Clear Policies for Retaining and Discarding Data and Material
- Quality Control
- Well-Defined Policies for Function of Research and Service at the Facility
- Sophisticated Information Retrieval and Transfer Systems
- Issues and Problems
- One Uniform Policy on Resource Sharing is Not Possible
- Incentives and Rewards for Resource Sharing are Not Fully Developed
- Methods for Enforcing Existing Policies on Resource Sharing are Inadequate
- There are Many Private and Public Stakeholders in Any Major Resource Sharing Attempt, Often with Conflicting Goals
- Who Pays and What Do They Pay for?
- Regulatory Requirements and Documentation Can Be Unnecessarily Complex and Burdensome
- Education of Scientists Covers Neither the Ethos of Sharing Nor Intellectual and Tangible Property Issues
- Resource Sharing Can Have National and International Implications
- There is a Gap in Leadership
- Partnerships in Resource Sharing May Be Unequal
- Monopolies Can Be Good or Bad
- RECOMMENDATIONS
- 1 Introduction
- COMPETITION FOR FUNDS
- INCENTIVES FOR SCIENTISTS
- NATIONALISM
- METHODS AND GOALS OF THIS STUDY
- A Member Survey
- The Committee.
- The Workshop
- The Report and Its Recommendations
- REFERENCES
- 2 The American Type Culture Collection
- GENERAL FACILITIES
- PROGRAMS
- Collection, Research, and Services Program
- Professional Services Program
- Education Services Program
- Information Services Program
- OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS ISSUES
- COST ISSUES
- OTHER ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- 3 The Multinational Coordinated Arabidopsis Thaliana Genome Research Project
- PROJECT ELEMENTS
- OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS ISSUES
- COST ISSUES
- OTHER ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- 4 The Jackson Laboratory
- ANIMAL RESOURCE PROGRAMS
- Production, Sale, Derivation, and Maintenance of Mice
- Preservation
- Derivation
- Surgery
- Bioinformatics
- OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS ISSUES
- COST ISSUES
- OTHER ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- 5 The Washington Regional Primate Research Center
- FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS
- OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS ISSUES
- COST ISSUES
- OTHER ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- 6 The Macromolecular Crystallography Resource at the Cornell High-Energy Synchrotron Source
- USER FACILITIES FOR PROTEIN CRYSTALLOGRAPHY AT SYNCHROTRONS
- THE MACCHESS RESEARCH RESOURCE
- Core Research Projects
- Collaborative Research Projects
- User Research Projects (Service)
- Training and Dissemination
- Workshops and Symposia
- Training Videos
- CHESS Newsletter
- MacCHESS World Wide Web (WWW) Home Page
- OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS ISSUES
- COST ISSUES
- OTHER ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- 7 The Human Genome Center: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY
- HUMAN GENOME CENTER
- Instrumentation and Technology
- Information
- Biological Materials
- Chromosome 19-Specific Cosmids
- Image Consortium cDNA Clones
- OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS ISSUES
- SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- 8 Conclusions and Recommendations
- FEATURES OF SUCCESSFUL RESOURCE SHARING.
- Strong Scientific Leadership in Agencies and the Research Community
- Adequate Core Funding
- Marketing and Advertising
- Clear Guidelines about Ownership and Access
- User Fees
- Clear Policies for Retaining and Discarding Data and Material
- Quality Control
- Well-Defined Policies for Function of Research and Service at the Facility
- Sophisticated Information Retrieval and Transfer Systems
- ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
- One Uniform Policy on Resource Sharing is Not Possible
- Incentives and Rewards for Resource Sharing are Not Fully Developed
- Sharing Requires Incentives, Not Disincentives
- The Importance of Material and Data Assets Changes Over Time
- Technologies and Needs are Evolving Very Rapidly
- New Definitions of "Publication" May Have to Evolve to Keep Pace with the New Electronic Information Systems
- Methods for Enforcing Existing Policies on Sharing are Inadequate
- There are Many Private and Public Stakeholders in any Major Resource Sharing Attempt, Often With Conflicting Goals
- Who Pays and What Do They Pay for?
- Regulatory Requirements and Documentation Can Be Unnecessarily Complex and Burdensome
- Education of Scientists Covers Neither the Ethos of Sharing Nor Intellectual and Tangible Property Issues
- Resource Sharing Can Have National and International Implications
- There is a Gap in Leadership
- Partnerships in Sharing Resources May Be Unequal
- Monopolies Can Be Good or Bad
- RECOMMENDATIONS
- Appendix A Workshop on Resource Sharing in Biomedical Research
- Appendix B Acronyms.
