Understanding the Generality of Mathematical Statements An Experimental Study at the Transition from School to University

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Damrau, Milena (-)
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Wiesbaden : Springer Vieweg. in Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2024.
Edición:1st ed
Colección:Bielefelder Schriften Zur Didaktik der Mathematik Series
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009799919506719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abstract
  • Contents
  • List of Figures
  • List of Tables
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Theoretical Background of Mathematical Statements and Proof
  • 2.1 Mathematical Statements
  • 2.2 Generality in Mathematics
  • 2.3 What is Proof?
  • 2.3.1 Brief Historical Background
  • 2.3.2 Different Views and Usages of the Term Proof
  • 2.3.3 Characteristics and Acceptance Criteria for Proof
  • 2.4 Reasoning, Argumentation, and Proving in Mathematics Education
  • 2.4.1 Definition of and Relation between Reasoning, Argumentation, and Proving
  • 2.4.2 Types of Arguments
  • 3 State of Research
  • 3.1 Understanding Generality and the Role of (Counter-)Examples
  • 3.2 Activities Related to Proof
  • 3.2.1 Comprehension of Statements
  • 3.2.2 Estimation of Truth of Statements
  • 3.2.3 Proof Evaluation
  • 3.2.4 Proof Comprehension
  • 3.2.5 Justification
  • 3.2.6 Relation Between Activities
  • 3.3 Resources
  • 4 Derivation of Research Questions
  • 5 Methodology
  • 5.1 Research Design
  • 5.1.1 Justification of the Research Approach
  • 5.1.2 Overview of the Research Process
  • 5.2 Data Collection
  • 5.2.1 Setting
  • 5.2.2 Participants
  • 5.2.3 Structure of the Experiment
  • 5.3 Instruments
  • 5.3.1 Selection of Statements and Arguments
  • 5.3.2 Conviction of the Truth of Statements
  • 5.3.3 Comprehension of Arguments
  • 5.3.4 Justification: Students' Proof Schemes
  • 5.3.5 Understanding the Generality of Statements
  • 5.3.6 Cognitive Reflection Test
  • 5.3.7 Demographics
  • 5.4 Data Analysis
  • 5.4.1 Statistical Analysis
  • 5.4.2 Content Analysis
  • 5.4.3 Conviction of the Truth of Statements
  • 5.4.4 Comprehension of Arguments
  • 5.4.5 Justification: Students' Proof Schemes
  • 5.4.6 Understanding the Generality of Statements
  • 6 Results
  • 6.1 Preliminary Analysis
  • 6.2 Conviction of the Truth of Statements.
  • 6.2.1 Estimation of Truth
  • 6.2.2 Proof Evaluation Regarding Conviction
  • 6.3 Comprehension of Arguments
  • 6.4 Justification: Students' Proof Schemes
  • 6.5 Understanding the Generality of Statements
  • 6.6 Analysis of Missing Values
  • 6.7 Summary of Main Results
  • 6.7.1 Influence of the Type of Argument
  • 6.7.2 Influence of the Type of Statement
  • 6.7.3 Students' Understanding of Generality and the Relation to Proof
  • 6.7.4 Predictive Power of Control Variables
  • 7 Discussion
  • 7.1 Interpretation
  • 7.1.1 Estimation of Truth and Proof Evaluation Regarding Conviction
  • 7.1.2 Comprehension of Arguments
  • 7.1.3 Justification: Students' Proof Schemes
  • 7.1.4 Understanding the Generality of Statements
  • 7.2 Reflections and Limitations
  • 7.2.1 The Adapted Framework on Proof-Related Activities
  • 7.2.2 Overall Research Design
  • 7.2.3 Conceptualization and Operationalization
  • 7.2.4 Number, Selection, and Order of Statements
  • 7.2.5 Open-Ended Questions and Content Analysis
  • 7.2.6 Control Variables
  • 7.2.7 Sample
  • 7.3 Implications for the Learning and Teaching of Proof …
  • 7.4 Directions for Future Research
  • 7.4.1 Further Investigating Students' Understanding of the Generality of Statements
  • 7.4.2 Self-Reported Data and Reality
  • 7.4.3 Question Order Effects
  • 8 Conclusions
  • 1 References.