Enhancing Rural Innovation in the United States

When it comes to high-tech innovations, the United States leads the path amongst OECD economies. However, in the context of the national record-breaking activities in high tech innovation, there lies distinct and growing geographical disparities. This report dives into strategies for better understa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Paris : Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development 2023.
Edición:1st ed
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009786726806719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations and acronyms
  • Executive summary
  • Productivity gains, associated with innovation adoption, is stronger in rural areas
  • But the scale and scope of support for innovation in rural areas needs to go beyond R&amp
  • D investment
  • Ensuring quality access to public services such as digital infrastructure and education is critical
  • Polices to support innovation need to consider rural demographic trends
  • Supporting rural innovation in the United States
  • Key Recommendations
  • Improving policy design and implementation for rural innovation
  • Improving access to high-quality broadband, skills and education for entrepreneurship
  • Better track and measure innovation relevant to rural areas
  • 1 Assessment and recommendations
  • Assessments
  • Rural counties are growing but disparities between places are increasing.
  • There is convergence in productivity between rural and metropolitan counties
  • However, structural change is impacting rural counties...
  • …and, productivity growth is coinciding with a relative decline in employment
  • Productivity gains, in part due to innovation adoption, is stronger in rural areas…
  • …and, there still remains a margin of opportunity to invest in innovation in rural counties
  • Equal opportunities for innovation and entrepreneurship across metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties is critical
  • The share of persistently poor counties is 5 times higher in rural counties than in metropolitan counties
  • Workers in rural counties are ageing faster
  • The scale and scope of innovation in rural areas in the United States
  • Innovation in rural America is supported by direct and indirect funding and support from federal agencies
  • However, the focus on direct support for technology-based innovation is at odds with how rural innovation occurs.
  • Eligibility for federal programmes varies across spatial scales, which hinders participation of local governments
  • Rural innovators' barriers to finance can be overcome by involving a wider pool of stakeholders
  • Non-bank financial intermediaries can help overcome barriers for access to finance
  • With more support, non-governmental organisations (NGO) and community-based organisations can continuously contribute to foster community development
  • Broadband connectivity is an important condition for innovation, yet there are substantial gaps to high-quality broadband access in rural and Tribal Land areas, in comparison with urban areas
  • Rural areas in the United States have lower broadband coverage, less choice of internet providers and lower speed rates than urban regions
  • The United States government has recognised the importance of broadband connectivity for all, regardless of where they live
  • Access to quality education has been a barrier for many rural counties
  • Access to education in rural counties is more expensive and of lower quality than in urban counties
  • Skills training needs to match local labour market demands
  • Higher education and R&amp
  • D institutions can have a positive impact on local innovation
  • Recommendations
  • Improving policy design and implementation for rural innovation
  • Promoting a broader view of innovation policy for diverse rural areas
  • Implementing programs in accordance with different scales of intervention
  • Ensuring effective co-ordination mechanisms across levels of government and capacity for multi-level governance
  • Building a culture of experimentation in rural entrepreneurship
  • Improving access to high-quality broadband in rural areas
  • Better assessing the state of broadband connectivity.
  • Extending connectivity by easing barriers to infrastructure deployment and complementing measures through local bottom-up approaches
  • Making the most out of existing funding and programmes for broadband connectivity
  • Supporting students in skills development and entrepreneurship training
  • Improving skills needed for the local labour market and for higher education
  • Promoting education for entrepreneurship
  • Tackling the challenge of measuring innovation in rural areas
  • References
  • Notes
  • 2 Understanding innovation in rural United States
  • Setting the scene for rural innovation in the United States
  • Understanding economic activities and rural well-being in the United States
  • Sector dynamics across US territories
  • Innovation in the United States
  • Individuals as drivers of innovation
  • Firm-based innovation: Competition, higher education and research institutions
  • Promoting equitable opportunities for innovation
  • Innovation, inequalities and demographic change
  • Trends in inequalities
  • Trends in population and demography
  • Population and employment
  • Aging workers
  • Gender diversity
  • Foreign-born workers
  • Persistently poor counties
  • Innovation outcomes for non-metropolitan counties
  • Drivers of high-tech innovation, employment and productivity
  • Annex 2.A. Defining rural geographies
  • Annex 2.B. Rural proofing innovation
  • Annex 2.C. Patentable occupations
  • Annex 2.D. Education and patent intensity
  • Annex 2.E. Understanding explained and unexplained differences between two groups through a counter-factual exercise: The Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition
  • References
  • Notes
  • 3 Policies and programmes for innovation in rural areas in the United States
  • Policies and programmes that impact rural innovation in the United States
  • The federal government plays a significant role in fostering rural innovation.
  • The USDA has a formal responsibility for the co-ordination of rural policy
  • The EDA is the only agency with an explicit focus on place-based economic development
  • The Department of the Interior manages public lands and upholds Federal trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and Native Alaskans
  • The Small Business Administration provides support for new entrepreneurs and for small businesses seeking to expand
  • Different types of support for rural innovation
  • A holistic approach to rural innovation is important
  • Rural innovation in diverse rural regions: opportunities and challenges
  • About the regions - Pine Bluff, Gallup, Columbiana
  • Pine Bluff, Arkansas
  • Gallup, New Mexico
  • Columbiana, Ohio
  • Innovation as part of rural community economic development
  • Prominent role for developers and the private sector
  • Major differences in what can be accomplished due to size authority and fiscal capacity
  • Role of the federal government varied across the three cases
  • High level of local government innovation
  • Strong commitment to enhancing workforce skills
  • Maximising opportunities and mitigating challenges to rural innovation
  • Integrating geographic constraints into rural policy
  • Co-ordinating to support rural innovation and ensure equity
  • Co-ordinating to consider all the factors needed to support rural innovation
  • Co-ordinating to ensure equity for marginalised populations in rural innovation
  • Improving access to finance
  • Funding rural development and innovation
  • Rural non-bank financial intermediaries
  • Broadening the definition of innovation in OECD rural regions
  • Domains and sources of rural innovation
  • Conclusions
  • Annex 3.A. Additional descriptions of case study areas
  • Columbiana, Ohio
  • A former steel town facing population decline
  • Collaboration and engagement
  • Key assets and opportunities.
  • Examples of innovative private enterprise
  • Pine Bluff, Arkansas
  • An industrial and agricultural economy facing population decline
  • Key assets and opportunities
  • The Go Forward Pine Bluff (GFPB) development approach
  • Fostering entrepreneurship
  • Gallup, New Mexico
  • A city deeply connected to the Navajo Nation in the midst of energy economy transition
  • Collaboration and engagement
  • Key assets and opportunities
  • References
  • Notes
  • 4 Improving broadband connectivity and access to education in the United States
  • Broadband connectivity to boost rural innovation
  • Setting the scene: The importance of connectivity for the digital transformation
  • Going "rural" in the United States: Access to broadband to boost rural innovation, a bottom-up perspective
  • State of broadband connectivity in the United States
  • Broadband subscriptions and performance
  • Existing territorial connectivity divides
  • Bridging connectivity divides in the United States
  • Promoting competition and incentives to invest in broadband networks
  • The importance of granular data on broadband availability and quality
  • Easing infrastructure deployment as key element to boost investment in networks
  • The role of local governments to ease broadband network deployment
  • Making information available for operators to increase deployment efficiency
  • Promoting efficient spectrum management to bridge connectivity divides
  • Community networks and local ISPs connecting rural areas
  • Towards "digital equity": Fostering broadband adoption among disadvantaged groups
  • Affordability, a key obstacle for broadband adoption by disadvantaged groups
  • Digital literacy and its role in bridging digital divides
  • Connecting small and medium firms
  • A window of opportunity: Broadband infrastructure funding in the United States.
  • Enabling Human Capital Assets for Innovation: Education.