Advances in remote sensing technology and the three poles

ADVANCES IN REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY AND THE THREE POLES Covers recent advances in remote sensing technology applied to the "Three Poles", a concept encompassing the Arctic, Antarctica, and the Himalayas Advances in Remote Sensing Technology and the Three Poles is a multidisciplinary appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Pandey, Manish (Assistant professor), author (author)
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Inc [2023]
Materias:
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009755210606719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • Advances in Remote Sensing Technology and the Three Poles
  • Contents
  • About the Editors
  • Notes on Contributors
  • Foreword
  • Preface
  • List of Acronyms
  • Section I Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) Applications in Polar Studies
  • 1 The Three Poles: Advances in Remote Sensing in Relation to Spheres of the Planet Earth
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.1.1 Earth as a System and Components of the Earth System
  • 1.1.2 Role of the "Three Poles" and the Three Poles Regions in the Earth System
  • 1.1.2.1 Defining the Three Poles, Three Poles Regions, and Their Geographical Extent
  • 1.1.2.2 Interaction Among Components of the Earth System and Role of the Three Poles
  • 1.1.3 Advancement of RS Technologies in Relation to Their Application in the Three Poles Regions
  • 1.1.3.1 Remote Sensing Technology Advancements
  • 1.1.3.2 Role of Remote Sensing (RS) in Mapping/Monitoring/Quantitative Analysis of Sub-Systems of Our Planet in the Three Poles Regions
  • 1.2 Aim of the Book and Its Five Sections
  • 1.3 Overview of the Contributing Chapters Covering Research About Different Aspects of the Sub-Systems of Our Planet in the Three Poles Regions
  • 1.4 Summary and Recommendations
  • References
  • 2 Continuous Satellite Missions, Data Availability, and Nature of Future Satellite Missions with Implications to Polar Regions
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.1.1 Types of Orbit
  • 2.1.1.1 High Earth Orbit (HEO)
  • 2.1.1.2 Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
  • 2.1.1.3 Semi-Synchronous Orbit
  • 2.1.1.4 Molniya Orbit
  • 2.1.1.5 Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
  • 2.1.1.6 Polar Orbit and Sun-Synchronous Orbit
  • 2.1.1.7 Lagrange's Point
  • 2.2 Satellite Missions and Data Availability
  • 2.3 Future Satellite Missions
  • 2.4 Applicability of Satellite Products in Three Poles Regions
  • 2.5 Challenges and Limitations
  • 2.6 Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • References.
  • 3 Assessing the Accuracy of Digital Elevation Models for Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalayas
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Study Area
  • 3.3 Materials and Methods
  • 3.3.1 Generation of Cartosat-1 DEM and Orthoimage
  • 3.3.2 TanDEM-X
  • 3.3.3 ALOS PALSAR
  • 3.3.4 DGPS Survey for Obtaining Ground Control Points (GCPs)
  • 3.3.5 Datum Transformation
  • 3.3.6 Accuracy Assessment Methods
  • 3.3.6.1 Vertical Accuracy
  • 3.3.6.2 Spatial Accuracy
  • 3.4 Results and Discussion
  • 3.4.1 Vertical Accuracy Assessment: Comparison of DEMs With Reference to GCPs
  • 3.4.2 Vertical Accuracy of DEMs for Different Land Use Classes
  • 3.4.2.1 Dense Forest
  • 3.4.2.2 Open Forest
  • 3.4.2.3 Tea Garden
  • 3.4.2.4 Built-up Area
  • 3.4.3 Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Comparison of DEMs With Reference to Stream Networks
  • 3.5 Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 4 An Overview of Morphometry Software Packages, Tools, and Add-ons
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Overview of Morphometry Tools and Toolboxes
  • 4.3 Stand-Alone Tools
  • 4.4 Tools that Run within Coding Bases
  • 4.5 Conclusion
  • References
  • 5 Landscape Modeling, Glacier and Ice Sheet Dynamics, and the Three Poles: A Review of Models, Softwares, and Tools
  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Taxonomy
  • 5.2.1 Geomorphic Process-Based Models
  • 5.2.2 Classification Based on Process of Modeling
  • 5.2.2.1 Based on Geomorphic Processes
  • 5.2.2.2 Based on Modeling Process
  • 5.3 Working Principles for Geomorphological Models
  • 5.3.1 Soil Production
  • 5.3.2 Hillslope Transport
  • 5.3.3 Land Sliding
  • 5.3.4 Fluvial Incision and Transport
  • 5.3.5 Glacial Erosion
  • 5.4 Landscape Evolution Models
  • 5.4.1 DEM-Based Models
  • 5.4.2 SIBERIA
  • 5.4.3 GOLEM
  • 5.4.4 CASCADE
  • 5.4.5 ZScape
  • 5.4.6 CHILD
  • 5.4.7 CAESAR
  • 5.4.8 APERO
  • 5.4.9 SIGNUM (Simple Integrated Geomorphological Numerical Model).
  • 5.4.10 TTLEM (TopoToolbox Landscape Evolution Model) 1.0
  • 5.5 Other Models
  • 5.5.1 DELIM
  • 5.5.2 EROS
  • 5.5.3 Landscape Evolution Model Using Global Search
  • 5.5.4 eSCAPE
  • 5.5.5 r.sim.terrain 1.0
  • 5.6 Combined/Application-Specific Models
  • 5.7 Machine Learning Models
  • 5.8 LEMs Developed for Glaciated Landscapes
  • 5.9 Some Significant Glacier Evolution Models
  • 5.10 Models Developed for Alpine Regions
  • 5.11 Models Developed for the Arctic Regio
  • 5.12 Models Developed for the Antarctic Region
  • 5.13 Conclusion and Future Prospects
  • Acknowledgment
  • Declaration of Competing Interest
  • References
  • 6 Spectral Indices Across Remote Sensing Platforms and Sensors Relating to the Three Poles: An Overview of Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects
  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Database and Methodology
  • 6.3 Rationale of Different Spectral Indices Across RS Sensors and Platforms
  • 6.4 RS Sensors and Platforms: Characteristics (Spatial, Temporal, Spectral, and Radiometric Resolutions)
  • 6.5 Most Widely and Popularly Used Spectral Indices
  • 6.5.1 Spectral Indices and Lithosphere
  • 6.5.2 Spectral Indices and Hydrosphere
  • 6.5.3 Spectral Indices and Atmosphere
  • 6.5.4 Spectral Indices and Biosphere
  • 6.5.5 Spectral Indices and Anthroposphere
  • 6.6 Thematic Evolution and Trends
  • 6.6.1 Thematic and Network Maps
  • 6.7 Summary and Recommendations
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Section II Antarctica: The Southernmost Continent Having the South Pole Environment and Remote Sensing
  • 7 Glacier Dynamics in East Antarctica: A Remote Sensing Perspective
  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Satellite Remote Sensing of Glacier Dynamics in East Antarctica
  • 7.3 Glacier Velocity Estimation Using Remote Sensing
  • 7.3.1 Glacier Velocity Estimation Using SAR Interferometry
  • 7.3.2 Glacier Velocity Estimation Using Offset Tracking.
  • 7.4 Remote Sensing Based Dynamics of PRG: A Case Study
  • 7.4.1 Data and Methods
  • 7.4.2 Results and Discussion
  • 7.4.2.1 Ice Front Location
  • 7.4.2.2 Glacier Velocity Over the Period of 2016-2019
  • 7.4.3 Summary and Conclusion
  • References
  • 8 Terrestrial Deglaciation Signatures in East Antarctica
  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Geomorphology
  • 8.2.1 East Antarctica
  • 8.3 Landform Variation Concerning Various Sectors and Elevation
  • 8.3.1 Dronning Maud Land
  • 8.3.2 Enderby Land
  • 8.3.3 Mac. Robertson Land, Amery Ice Shelf, and Prince Elizabeth Land
  • 8.3.4 Wilkes Land
  • 8.4 Chronology
  • 8.4.1 Dronning Maud Land
  • 8.4.2 Enderby Land
  • 8.4.3 Mac. Robertson Land, Amery Ice Shelf 's and Princess Elizabeth Land
  • 8.4.4 Wilkes Land
  • 8.5 Discussion
  • 8.6 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 9 Geospatial Tools for Monitoring Vertebrate Populations in Antarctica With a Note on the Ecological Component of the Indian Antarctic Program
  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Novel Geospatial Tools for Biodiversity Monitoring in Antarctica
  • 9.2.1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • 9.2.2 Satellite Imagery
  • 9.3 Spatial Mapping of Seabirds Under the Indian Antarctic Program
  • 9.4 Recommendations to Incorporate New Tools for Antarctic Wildlife Monitoring Program
  • 9.5 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 10 Bryophytes of Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica and Future Prospects
  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Study Area
  • 10.3 Materials and Methods
  • 10.4 Taxonomic Treatment
  • 10.5 Phytosociological Studies
  • 10.6 Results and Discussion
  • 10.7 Future Prospects
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 11 Antarctic Sea Ice Variability and Trends Over the Last Four Decades
  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 Datasets and Methods
  • 11.2.1 Sea Ice Extent Analysis
  • 11.2.2 Analysis of Physical Parameters
  • 11.3 Results and Discussion.
  • 11.3.1 Sea Ice Variability in the Southern Ocean
  • 11.3.2 Sea Ice Distribution With Respect to Ocean-Atmospheric Temperature
  • 11.4 Summary and Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Section III Himalayas: The Third Pole Environment and Remote Sensing
  • 12 Some Unresolved Problems in the Himalaya: A Synoptic View
  • 12.1 Introduction
  • 12.2 Stratigraphic Ages, Basin Configuration, and Palaeontology
  • 12.3 Sedimentology
  • 12.4 Tectonics and Structure
  • 12.5 Magmatism and Geochronology
  • 12.6 Metamorphism
  • 12.7 Mineral Deposits
  • 12.8 Palaeomagnetic Studies
  • 12.9 Glaciological Studies
  • 12.10 Geomorphological Studies
  • 12.11 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 13 Fluctuations of Kolahoi Glacier, Kashmir Valley, Its Assessment With Tree-Rings of Pinus wallichiana and Comparable Satellite Imageries and Field Survey Records
  • 13.1 Introduction
  • 13.2 Tree-Ring Sampling Site and Data Acquisition
  • 13.3 Tree-Ring Chronology and Its Assessments
  • 13.4 Fluctuations of Kolahoi Glacier: Existing Records and Its Assessment With Tree-Rings
  • 13.5 Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • 14 Applications of ICESat-2 Photon Data in the Third Pole Environment
  • 14.1 Introduction
  • 14.2 Brief Background About NASA's ICESat-2 Mission
  • 14.3 Terrain Profiling From ICESat-2 Photon Elevations Over a Mountainous Region
  • 14.4 Longitudinal Profiling of Rivers in a Mountainous Region
  • 14.5 Inland Water Level Detection in Mountainous Regions Using ICESat-2 Photon Data
  • 14.6 Inferring Annual Variations of Water Levels in Mountain Lakes Using ICESat-2's ATL13 Data Product
  • 14.7 Inferring Lake Ice Phenology in Mountainous Regions Using ICESat-2 Photon Data
  • 14.8 Estimating Tree Heights in Mountain Regions Using ICESat-2 Photon Data
  • 14.9 Utilization of ICESat-2 Photon Data to Generate Digital Elevation Models.
  • 14.10 Conclusion.