Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2016
This annual publication provides information on policy developments and related support to agriculture in OECD countries and selected partner economies, measured with the OECD Producer Support Estimate methodology. Countries covered by the report represent almost 90% of the global value added in agr...
Corporate Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | eBook |
Language: | Inglés |
Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
OECD Publishing
2016.
|
Subjects: | |
See on Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009704775206719 |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Foreword
- Table of contents
- Acknowledgements
- Reader's guide Definition of OECD indicators of agricultural support
- Nominal indicators used in this report
- Ratio indicators and percentage indicators
- Box 1. Definitions of categories in the PSE classification
- Decomposition indicators
- Definition of GSSE categories
- Box 2. Definitions of categories in the GSSE classification
- Table: OECD indicators of support
- Sources and definitions of contextual indicators
- Table 2.X.1. Contextual indicators
- Table 2.X.2. Productivity and environmental indicators
- Figure 2.X.1. Main macro-economic indicators
- Figure 2.X.2. Agro-food trade
- Figure 2.X.3. Composition of agricultural output growth
- Figure 2.X.4. Composition of agro-food trade
- Figure 2.X.5. Environmental indicators
- Currencies
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- Executive summary
- Recommendations
- Chapter 1. Developments in agricultural policy and support
- Key economic and market developments
- Table 1.1. Key economic indicators*
- Figure 1.1. Commodity world price indices, 2007 to 2015
- Developments in agricultural policies
- Box 1.1. Meeting of the OECD Committee for Agriculture at Ministerial Level 7-8 April 2016
- Box 1.2. Sizing up the SDGs: What is the importance of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for Agriculture?
- Box 1.3. What are the implications of COP 21 for agriculture?
- Box 1.4. What does the Nairobi package imply for agriculture?
- Developments in agricultural support
- Agricultural sectors and total support as measured by the TSE
- Figure 1.2. Country shares in total agricultural value added and total TSE, 1995-97 and 2013-15
- Figure 1.3. Total Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2013-15
- Support to farmers shows opposite trends in OECD and emerging economies.
- Figure 1.4. Composition of Total Support Estimate by country, 2013-15 (percentage of GDP)
- Figure 1.5. Evolution of Producer Support Estimate, 1995 to 2015 (percentage of gross farm receipts)
- Figure 1.6. Producer Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2013-15 (percentage of gross farm receipts)
- Box 1.5. What drove changes in the monetary value of producer support in 2015?
- Figure 1.7. Contribution of MPS and budgetary payments to the change in the Producer Support Estimate in 2015
- Figure 1.8. Contribution of price gaps and output quantities to the change in the MPS in 2015
- Figure 1.9. Composition of Producer Support Estimate by country, 2013-15 (percentage of gross farm receipts)
- Figure 1.10. Composition of payments based on area, animal numbers, receipts, and income by country, 1995-97 and 2013-15 (percentage of gross farm receipts)
- Figure 1.11. Producer Nominal Protection Coefficient by country, 1995-97 and 2013-15
- Figure 1.12. Single Commodity Transfers, all countries, 1995-97 and 2013-15 (percentage of gross receipts for each commodity)
- Figure 1.13. Support conditional on the adoption of specific production practices, 1995-97 and 2013-15 (percentage of gross farm receipts)
- Box 1.6. The role of exchange rates in measuring support to agriculture
- Figure 1.14. Exchange rate movements of selected currencies against the US dollar, 2000-15
- Table 1.2. Development in total PSE in selected currencies, 2014 to 2015
- Figure 1.15. Evolution of relative support indicators for the aggregate of all countries covered in this report, 1995 to 2015
- Support to general services varies significantly across countries in both size and priorities
- Figure 1.16. General Services Support Estimate: share in TSE and composition
- Consumers in most countries continue to pay for agricultural support.
- Figure 1.17. Consumer Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2013-15 (percentage of consumption expenditure at farm gate)
- Assessing support and reforms
- Box 1.7. Agricultural risk management: A holistic approach
- Notes
- References
- Chapter 2. Country snapshots
- 2.1. Australia
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.1. Australia: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.1. Australia: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.2. Brazil
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.2. Brazil: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.2. Brazil: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.3. Canada
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.3. Canada: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.3. Canada: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.4. Chile
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.4. Chile: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.4. Chile: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.5. China
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.5. China: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.5. China: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.6. Colombia
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.6. Colombia: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.6. Colombia: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.7. European Union
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.7. European Union: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations.
- Table 2.7. European Union: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.8. Iceland
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.8. Iceland: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.8. Iceland: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.9. Indonesia
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.9. Indonesia: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.9. Indonesia: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.10. Israel
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.10. Israel: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.10. Israel: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.11. Japan
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.11. Japan: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.11. Japan: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.12. Kazakhstan
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.12. Kazakhstan: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.12. Kazakhstan: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.13. Korea
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.13. Korea: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.13. Korea: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.14. Mexico
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.14. Mexico: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.14. Mexico: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.15. New Zealand
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.15. New Zealand: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support.
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.15. New Zealand: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.16. Norway
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.16. Norway: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.16. Norway: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.17. Russian Federation
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.17. Russian Federation: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.17. Russia: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.18. South Africa
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.18. South Africa: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.18. South Africa: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.19. Switzerland
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.19. Switzerland: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.19. Switzerland: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.20. Turkey
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.20. Turkey: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.20. Turkey: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.21. Ukraine
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.21. Ukraine: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.21. Ukraine: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.22. United States
- Support to agriculture
- Figure 2.22. United States: Level, structure and evolution of agricultural support
- Main policy changes
- Assessment and recommendations
- Table 2.22. United States: Estimates of support to agriculture
- 2.23. Viet Nam.
- Support to agriculture.