OECD integrity review of Thailand towards coherent and effective integrity policies

This review analyses Thailand's integrity system. It takes stock of the country's recent efforts to tackle corruption, such as the creation of anti-corruption commissions and legislation. Based on the 2017 OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity, the review makes concrete policy recommenda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (author)
Autor Corporativo: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, author, issuing body (author)
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Paris : OECD [2018]
Colección:OECD public governance reviews.
Materias:
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009703608206719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • Acronyms and abbreviations
  • Executive summary
  • Towards co-ordinated integrity institutions
  • Cultivating a culture of integrity
  • Chapter 1. An overview of governance and corruption in Thailand
  • Introduction
  • International governance and corruption indicators
  • The business perspective on corruption
  • The citizen perspective on corruption
  • The review's analytical framework for assessing public sector integrity
  • References
  • Chapter 2. Encouraging a comprehensive and co-ordinated integrity system in Thailand
  • Introduction: Effective public integrity systems. Thailand could reinforce the National Anti-Corruption Strategy by expanding the secretariat function of the NACC Sub-Commission for Strategy ImplementationTo counter the public perception of corruption, Thailand could strengthen the measurement framework for anti-corruption policies by using policy indicators
  • Thailand may raise the strategic impact of the Integrity and Transparency Assessment (ITA) by fine-tuning its methodology and by linking it with the indicators and objectives of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy. Thailand could strengthen the impact of the Integrity and Transparency Assessment by providing opportunities for institutional learning and knowledge sharingTo increase the efficiency, coherence and sustainability of anti-corruption initiatives, Thailand could establish a programmatic, multi-year approach to the budget allocation process, for measures and activities underpinning the National Anti-Corrupt ...
  • Thailand may streamline the mandates of NACC, PACC and OCSC and consolidate the mandate for public sector integrity for the executive branch within PACC. Thailand may centralise and consolidate the mandate for criminal investigations of corruption cases in the public sector within NACC, to encourage efficiencyThailand may phase out temporary anti-corruption bodies, such as the National Administration Centre for Anti-Corruption, integrating them into existing structures and mandates
  • To mainstream anti-corruption policies in government institutions, Thailand could increase the capacity of the Anti-Corruption Operation Centres (ACOCs) and co-ordination by PACC. To ensure continuity and independence, Thailand may strengthen the merit-based system for appointing NACC commissionersThailand could improve co-ordination and effectiveness of anti-corruption policy research by creating a policy research platform
  • To strengthen government accountability and anti-corruption policies, Thailand could reinforce the role of civil society organisations (CSO) in the anti-corruption policy cycle, and support CSO awareness-raising initiatives
  • Proposals for action
  • References
  • Chapter 3. Strengthening public ethics in Thailand.