Integrated wastewater management for health and valorization a design manual for resource challenged cities
Adequate wastewater treatment in low to medium income cities worldwide has largely been a failure despite decades of funding. The still dominant end-of-pipe paradigm of treatment for surface water discharge, focusing principally on removal of organic matter, has not addressed the well-published prob...
Otros Autores: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Libro electrónico |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
London, England :
IWA Publishing
[2022]
|
Edición: | 1st ed |
Materias: | |
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009701631606719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover
- Contents
- Preface
- Chapter 1: Integrated wastewater management for reuse in agriculture
- 1.1 INTRODUCTION
- 1.1.1 Wastewater and agriculture
- 1.1.1.1 Increasing water scarcity and stress
- 1.1.1.2 Population growth
- 1.1.1.3 Wastewater as a resource
- 1.1.2 The end-of-pipe paradigm for wastewater discharge
- 1.1.2.1 Global wastewater production, treatment, reuse, and discharge
- 1.1.2.2 Water resources and wastewater discharges
- 1.1.2.3 Global discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus
- 1.1.2.4 Energy use in mechanized wastewater treatment
- 1.1.3 The integrated wastewater management paradigm
- 1.1.3.1 Wastewater as a water resource
- 1.1.3.2 Semi-arid climates: irrigation water requirement 1500 mm/yr
- 1.1.3.3 Valorization of nutrients (N and P) in wastewater
- 1.1.3.4 Value as fertilizer, 2021 prices
- 1.1.3.5 Energy saved from fertilizer production
- 1.1.3.6 CO2,equiv emissions saved from not using synthetic fertilizers
- 1.1.3.7 Valorization of energy from anaerobic processes
- 1.2 WASTEWATER REUSE IN AGRICULTURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF END-OF-PIPE PARADIGM
- 1.2.1 Historical use of wastewater in agriculture: 3000 BCE-1915 CE
- 1.2.2 Decline of wastewater reuse with end-of-pipe paradigm: 1915-1990
- 1.2.3 End-of-pipe paradigm with resource recovery in EU and North America: 2000-2020
- 1.2.3.1 Secondary treatment with tertiary processes and resource recovery
- 1.2.3.2 Wastewater reuse in agriculture in the EU and the US
- 1.2.4 Wastewater treatment and resource recovery in China: 1980-2020
- 1.2.4.1 Wastewater treatment and discharge of excess nitrogen to surface waters
- 1.2.4.2 Resource recovery in a Chinese 'concept wastewater treatment plant'
- 1.2.5 End-of-pipe paradigm in resource-limited cities/peri-urban areas: 2000-2020
- 1.2.5.1 Indirect reuse of wastewater in agriculture.
- 1.2.5.2 Direct reuse of inadequately treated wastewater in agriculture
- 1.2.5.3 Direct reuse in agriculture with effluent wastewater meeting WHO guidelines
- 1.3 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FOR AGRICULTURAL REUSE IN RESOURCE-LIMITED REGIONS
- 1.3.1 Urban population growth
- 1.3.2 Coverage of wastewater treatment in the EU and North America
- 1.3.3 Coverage of wastewater treatment in resource-limited SDG regions
- 1.3.4 Effectiveness of wastewater treatment in resource-challenged urban areas
- 1.3.4.1 Bolivia: waste stabilization ponds and wastewater reuse
- 1.3.4.2 Honduras: pathogen reduction in waste stabilization ponds
- 1.3.4.3 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: protozoan cyst and helminth egg removal in the WSP system
- 1.3.4.4 Lima, Peru: Vibrio cholera reduction in the San Juan de Miraflores WSP-reuse system
- 1.3.4.5 Mendoza, Argentina: Campo Espejo waste stabilization ponds with reuse in agriculture
- 1.4 THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND INTEGRATED WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
- 1.4.1 The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
- 1.4.2 Sustainable development goals relevant for integrated wastewater management
- 1.4.2.1 Goal 2: end hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition, promote sustainable agriculture
- 1.4.2.2 Goal: 3 ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all ages
- 1.4.2.3 Goal 6: ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
- Chapter 2: Selection of natural systems for wastewater treatment with reuse in agriculture
- 2.1 INTRODUCTION
- 2.2 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS AND TRADITIONAL LEVELS OF TREATMENT
- 2.2.1 Characteristics of domestic wastewater
- 2.2.1.1 Screenings and grit
- 2.2.1.2 Pathogens
- 2.2.1.3 Total suspended solids
- 2.2.1.4 Biodegradable organics
- 2.2.1.5 Nutrients
- 2.2.2 Levels of wastewater treatment.
- 2.3 PATHOGEN REDUCTION IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES
- 2.3.1 High-rate treatment processes
- 2.3.2 Pathogen reduction data from operating high-rate treatment systems
- 2.3.2.1 Activated sludge treatment plants without disinfection in Tunisia
- 2.3.2.2 Activated sludge treatment plant with chlorine disinfection in the US
- 2.3.2.3 Activated sludge treatment plants with microfiltration and disinfection in Spain
- 2.3.3 Natural system treatment processes
- 2.4 NATURAL SYSTEM TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR INTEGRATED WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
- 2.4.1 Facultative.maturation pond systems
- 2.4.1.1 Simplicity
- 2.4.1.2 Land requirements
- 2.4.1.3 Low cost
- 2.4.1.4 Minimal sludge handling
- 2.4.1.5 Process complexity and operation and maintenance requirements
- 2.4.1.6 Energy consumption
- 2.4.1.7 Process stability and resilience
- 2.4.2 Anaerobic.secondary facultative.maturation pond systems
- 2.4.3 UASB.secondary facultative.maturation pond systems
- 2.4.4 UASB.trickling filter.batch stabilization reservoir
- Chapter 3: Wastewater flows, design flowrate, and flow measurement
- 3.1 SOURCES OF WASTEWATER
- 3.2 WASTEWATER FLOWS
- 3.2.1 Domestic wastewater flow and urban water consumption
- 3.2.2 Infiltration and inflow
- 3.2.3 Industrial wastewater flows
- 3.3 DESIGN FLOWRATE
- 3.3.1 Design flowrate from wastewater flow data: the ideal case
- 3.3.2 Design flowrate by equation: the non-ideal case (but most common)
- 3.4 DESIGN EXAMPLE: DESIGN FLOWRATES FOR THE CITY OF TRINIDAD, HONDURAS
- 3.5 CASE STUDY: DESIGN FLOWRATE FOR SAYLLA, PERU
- Chapter 4: Preliminary treatment
- 4.1 INTRODUCTION
- 4.2 REMOVAL OF COARSE SOLIDS: BAR SCREENS
- 4.2.1 Design of bar screens
- 4.2.2 Design equations for bar screens and approach canal
- 4.2.3 Final disposal of screenings
- 4.3 GRIT REMOVAL: DESIGN OF GRIT CHAMBERS.
- 4.3.1 Free-flow Parshall flume equations for the design of grit chambers
- 4.3.2 Design of rectangular grit chambers
- 4.4 BYPASS CHANNEL DESIGN
- 4.5 PROCEDURE FOR PRELIMINARY TREATMENT DESIGN WITH THE PARSHALL FLUME
- 4.5.1 Case study design: preliminary treatment, WSP system, Catacamas, Honduras
- 4.6 FINAL DISPOSAL OF SCREENINGS AND GRIT
- Chapter 5: Theory and design of facultative ponds
- 5.1 NATURAL PROCESSES AS THE DRIVING FORCE IN FACULTATIVE PONDS
- 5.1.1 Algal and bacterial processes in the aerobic zone
- 5.1.2 Bacterial processes in the anaerobic zone
- 5.1.3 Process analysis: methane emissions from facultative pond, Catacamas, Honduras
- 5.2 THEORY OF DESIGN OF FACULTATIVE PONDS
- 5.2.1 Maximum organic surface loading
- 5.2.1.1 Sources of solar radiation data
- 5.2.1.1.1 CLIMWAT and CROPWAT
- 5.2.1.1.2 NASA POWER data access viewer
- 5.2.1.2 Water temperature and algal growth
- 5.2.1.2.1 Design water temperature
- 5.2.1.2.2 Temperature effects on algal growth
- 5.2.1.3 Case study: surface loading and facultative pond performance, Nagpur, India
- 5.2.1.4 Case study: organic overloading of facultative ponds in Honduras
- 5.2.2 Wind effects in facultative ponds
- 5.2.3 Hydraulic considerations
- 5.2.3.1 Longitudinal dispersion
- 5.2.3.2 Thermal stratification and hydraulic short circuiting
- 5.2.3.3 Sludge accumulation effect on hydraulic short circuiting
- 5.2.4 Pathogen reduction
- 5.2.4.1 Helminth egg reduction
- 5.2.4.2 E. coli or fecal coliform reduction
- 5.2.5 BOD5 removal
- 5.2.6 TSS removal
- 5.2.7 Sludge accumulation
- 5.2.7.1 Sludge accumulation reported in the literature
- 5.2.7.2 Projection of sludge accumulation with flowrates and solids loadings
- 5.2.7.3 Design example part 1: projection of sludge accumulation for TSS = 200 mg/L.
- 5.2.7.4 Design example part 2: projection of sludge accumulation for TSS = 350 mg/L
- 5.2.7.5 Discussion of design example results
- 5.3 FACULTATIVE POND DESIGN PROCEDURE
- 5.4 DESIGN EXAMPLE: FACULTATIVE POND REDESIGN FOR AGRICULTURAL REUSE, COCHABAMBA, BOLIVIA
- Chapter 6: Theory and design of maturation ponds
- 6.1 MATURATION PONDS AND PATHOGEN REDUCTION
- 6.1.1 Factors affecting pathogen reduction
- 6.1.1.1 Sunlight
- 6.1.1.2 Temperature
- 6.1.1.3 Hydraulic retention time
- 6.1.1.4 Sedimentation
- 6.1.1.5 Predation
- 6.1.2 Design strategies for pathogen reduction
- 6.1.2.1 Sunlight exposure
- 6.1.2.2 Depth
- 6.1.2.3 Maximize theoretical hydraulic retention time and minimize dispersion
- 6.1.2.4 Longitudinal dispersion and mean hydraulic retention time
- 6.1.2.5 Residence time distribution analysis to assess longitudinal dispersion
- 6.1.2.6 Limitations of residence time distribution studies
- 6.1.2.7 Case study: residence time distribution analysis to assess fecal coliform reduction in a maturation pond, Corinne, Utah, USA
- 6.1.2.8 Determination of residence time distribution parameters
- 6.1.2.9 Estimation of fecal coliform reduction using the Wehner and Wilhem equation
- 6.1.2.10 Comment on Corinne maturation pond case study
- 6.1.2.11 Wind abatement
- 6.1.2.12 Overflow rate
- 6.1.2.13 Rock filters
- 6.2 DESIGN OF MATURATION PONDS
- 6.2.1 Unbaffled ponds
- 6.2.1.1 Hydraulic retention time
- 6.2.1.2 Depths
- 6.2.1.3 Length to width ratios
- 6.2.1.4 Inlet/outlet structures
- 6.2.1.5 Case study: unbaffled maturation ponds in series, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- 6.2.2 Baffled ponds
- 6.2.2.1 Depths
- 6.2.2.2 Length to width ratios
- 6.2.2.3 Transverse baffle equations: baffles parallel to width
- 6.2.2.4 Longitudinal baffle equations: baffles parallel to length.
- 6.2.2.5 Design example: comparison of transverse and longitudinal baffled ponds.