Peer review in an era of evaluation : understanding the practice of gatekeeping in academia

Peer review in an era of evaluation understanding the practice of gatekeeping in academia

This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer review is as old as modern science itself, recent changes in the evaluation culture of higher education systems have increased the use of peer review, and its purposes, forms and functions have become m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Forsberg, Eva (-), Geschwind, Lars, Levander, Sara, Wermke, Wieland
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cham : Springer International Publishing 2022.
Edición:1st ed. 2022.
Materias:
Peer review.
Research > Evaluation.
Avaluació d'experts
Investigació
Llibres electrònics
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009654432206719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • PART I – PEER REVIEW: INTRODUCTION AND ITS CONTEXT
  • 1: The Scientific Community, Academia and Peer Review;Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind & Sara Levander
  • 2: Hierarchies and Universal Inclusion in Scientific Communities; Rudolf Stichweh
  • 3: Authors, peer review, and publications – a socio-historical constellation; Raf Vanderstraeten
  • PART II – PEER REVIEW AND THE HIGHER EDUCATION EVALUATION MACHINERY
  • 4: Performances and Gatekeepers: Quality assurance of education and research in Dutch higher education; Don F. Westerheijden
  • 5: The many faces of peer review; Hanne Foss Hansen
  • 6: How gatekeepers sometimes enhance the effects of evaluation machineries in research; Peter Dahler Larsen
  • 7: Peer review in public administration: a contradiction in terms?; Agnes Ers & Kristina Tegler Jerselius
  • PART III – SPECIFICITIES OF DIFFERENT PEER REVIEW PRACTICES
  • 8: Is Peer Review Fit for Purpose?; Malcolm Tight
  • 9: Peer advocacy – loyalties, wish lists and tough love in national peer review;Lars Geschwind
  • 10: Many faces of scientific evaluation: use of public, professional and organizational power; Jonna Kosonen, Tea Vellamo, Taru Siekkinen & Elias Pekkola
  • 11: Disciplinary boundary work - Peer-review and the (full) professorship; Eva Forsberg, Rita Foss Lindblad, Sara Levander & Sverker Lindblad
  • 12: Assessing academic careers: Crafting the ‘excellent’ professor in biomedicine, economics and history; Björn Hammarfelt
  • 13: Peer review in academic promotion – when teaching excellence is at stake; Maja Elmgren, Eva Forsberg, Sara Levander
  • 14: Performance-based evaluation metrics – influence at the macro, meso and micro level; Gustaf Nelhans
  • 15: The role of peer review in the evidence making processes of systematic review; Tine S. Prøitz & Magnus Levinsson
  • Part IV – PEER REVIEW: A FINAL ACCOUNT
  • Chapter 16: Peer review, an extended, challenged and migrating institution.

Ejemplares similares