Procedural justice and relational theory empirical, philosophical, and legal perspectives
This book bridges a scholarly divide between empirical and normative theorizing about procedural justice in the context of relations of power between citizens and the state. Empirical research establishes that people’s understanding of procedural justice is shaped by relational factors. A central pr...
| Otros Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro electrónico |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
London ; New York, New York :
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2021.
|
| Colección: | Routledge research in legal philosophy.
|
| Materias: | |
| Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009632340206719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Introduction: procedural justice in law, psychology, and philosophy
- Part I Procedural justice in policing, courts and prisons: empirical reviews
- 1. The empirical study of procedural justice policing in Australia: highlights and challenges
- 2. Procedural fairness and jury satisfaction: an analysis of relational dimensions
- 3. Procedural justice in corrections
- Part II Procedural justice and legitimacy: empirical and normative perspectives
- 4. Procedural justice, legitimacy and social contexts
- 5. Procedure-content interaction in attitudes to law and in the value of the rule of law: an empirical and philosophical collaboration
- 6. Legal legitimacy and the relevance of participatory procedures
- Part III The concept of procedural justice: philosophical perspectives
- 7. The inadequacy of instrumentalist theories of procedural justice
- 8. The many facets of procedural justice in legal proceedings
- 9. Procedural justice, relational equality and self-respect
- Part IV Implications and applications: legal institutions and the exercise of legal authority
- 10. Racial profiling as pejorative discrimination
- 11. Administrative discretion and governing relationships: situating procedural fairness
- 12. The framing of tribunal procedures: a question of balance or a participation-centred approach?
