Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment
Victims. Witnesses. Suspects. Answers to an interviewer’s questions may mean the difference between prison or freedom, custody or loss, justice served or justice miscarried–outcomes that depend on expert decision-making as much as on the answers themselves. Meticulously researched and reasoned by an...
| Otros Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro electrónico |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
Springer
c2013.
|
| Edición: | 1st ed. 2013. |
| Materias: | |
| Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009468916706719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- The challenge for forensic memory research: Methodolotry
- Credibility assessment, common law trials, and fuzzy logic
- The investigation and investigative interviewing of benefit fraud suspects in the UK: Historical and contemporary perspectives
- The sins of interviewing: Errors made by investigative interviewers and suggestions for redress
- Biopsychosocial perspectives on memory variability in eyewitnesses
- Children’s memory in “scientific case studies” of child sexual abuse: A review
- Does testimonial inconsistency indicate memory inaccuracy and deception? Beliefs, empirical research, and theory
- Repeated interviews about repeated trauma from the distant past: A study of report consistency
- Discovering deceit: Applying laboratory and field research in the search for truthful and deceptive behaviour
- Is le mot juste? The contexualization of words by expert lie detectors
- Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): An example of the new paradigm of differential recall enhancement
- The ABC’s of CBCA: Verbal credibility assessment in practice
- An “eye” for an “I”: The challenges and opportunities for spotting credibility in a digital world.
