Prehistoric myths in modern political philosophy
How modern philosophers use and perpetuate myths about prehistory.<p>The state of nature, the origin of property, the origin of government, the primordial nature of inequality and war - why do political philosophers talk so much about the Stone Age? And are they talking about a Stone Age that...
Otros Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Libro electrónico |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Edinburgh :
Edinburgh University Press
2017.
|
Edición: | 1st ed |
Materias: | |
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull: | https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009421473206719 |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Modern political philosophy and prehistoric anthropology: some preliminary issues
- The Hobbesian hypothesis: how a colonial prejudice became an essential premise in the most popular justification of government
- John Locke and the Hobbesian hypothesis: how a similar colonial prejudice became an essential premise in the most popular justification of private property rights
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in eighteenth-century political theory
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in nineteenth-century political theory
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in contemporary political theory
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in anthropology
- Nasty and brutish? An empirical assessment of the violence hypothesis
- Are you better off now than you were 12,000 years ago? An empirical assessment of the Hobbesian hypothesis
- Implications
- References
- Index.